Once that was done, then we could work our magic with Photoshop techniques or more plugins. We had to eliminate halos and use multiple programs just to get our dynamic range correct in the photo. We would tone map our bracketed photos, then load the originals in as layers, often masking in bits and pieces of the original frames to make up for the ugly artifacts that tone mapping created in the sky or other areas. A lot of photographers went through pains to make their HDR look more natural, but it was a long process. A grungy look, sort of like Elvis on velvet after a bad acid trip. Not only that, but HDR was known for having a “look”. They capture more dynamic range, so a single image has more data to control highlights and shadows. There are a lot of fads in photography and I heard others claim that the days of HDR were behind us. I’m very pleased with the product and I really wanted to show this to you.īefore I heard of this product, I started wondering if HDR as we knew it was dead. I had a chance to play around with a pre-release version of Aurora HDR by Macphun and Trey Ratcliff. We’ll review the user interface and you can see how easy it is to make stunning photos in one tool. I had time to work with a pre-release version, but now I can show you the released version in this video.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |